Latest News

Google’s Upcoming Gemini AI Model Set to Outshine OpenAI, But Controversy Arises

Research company SemiAnalysis has made the startling claim that Google’s eagerly awaited Gemini AI model is poised to surpass OpenAI’s offering by leveraging an unheard-before level of processing prowess. The announcement sent shockwaves across the IT community, prompting heated debates and keeping enthusiasts on the edge of their seats.

However, OpenAI’s CEO, Sam Altman, has dismissed these ambitious claims, implying that the data was likely cherry-picked from Google’s internal marketing materials. Altman said wryly, “Incredible how Google managed to convince that Semianalysis individual to broadcast their internal marketing/recruiting chart—lol.”

On August 28, the expert brains of Dylan Patel and Daniel Nishball methodically authored an in-depth research with the interesting title, “Google Gemini Eats The World – Gemini Smashes GPT-4 By 5X.” This intriguing analysis is based on the assumption that Google, endowed with superior processors and unprecedented processing capacity, is ready to change the AI field. However, the vexing question at the heart of the argument is whether increasing computational muscle unambiguously correlates to improved AI performance.

The enigmatic Gemini—an avant-garde, multi-modal AI model in the works at Google’s AI behemoth, DeepMind—is at the heart of this unfolding narrative. Gemini, which is set to make its grand premiere later in 2023, promises to be a game changer. Its “multi-modal” capabilities represent a quantum leap ahead, allowing it to process text, video, audio, and images with ease while producing both textual and visual outputs. ChatGPT, despite being a heavyweight in its own right, is limited to text and lacks the vast reach of its soon-to-be opponent.

Python programmer and AI enthusiast ‘Teknium’ shared his thoughts on this seismic shift, saying, “I fervently hope that someone manages to unseat OAI soon.” But, to be clear, claiming that Gemini outperforms GPT-4 by 5x is deceptive; it’s an issue of 5x compute, not necessarily 5x quality.”

While OpenAI’s ChatGPT is generating a lot of buzz, other digital behemoths like Google and Meta are hard at work developing their own formidable AI models. This dynamic terrain foreshadows a transformative year for large language models (LLMs).

Nonetheless, Google is facing a class-action lawsuit accusing it of misusing confidential consumer data in the quest to train its AI behemoths.

Google has struck collaborations with industry heavyweights like Meta and Anthropic to embed their AI models into the Google Cloud ecosystem, bolstering its competitive edge. This agreement gives Google’s cloud customers access to Meta’s Llama 2 LLM and Anthropic’s Claude 2 chatbot. These models may be modified smoothly utilizing enterprise data, providing enterprises with cutting-edge tools for their own apps and services.

As Google maintains its persistent quest of domination, replicating its stronghold on internet search, it aspires to become the go-to place for cloud clients seeking access to groundbreaking generative AI. The tech titan’s collaboration with Nvidia highlights its commitment to accelerating the creation of massive AI models.

The approaching release of Google’s Gemini AI model promises to transform the landscape in an era characterised by intense competition and bold advancements in AI capacity, but the repercussions of this seismic event are far from settled. The war for AI domination continues, and the world is watching with bated breath as two technological titans square off.


Crypto products and NFTs are unregulated and can be highly risky. There may be no regulatory recourse for any loss from such transactions. Crypto is not a legal tender and is subject to market risks. Readers are advised to seek expert advice and read offer document(s) along with related important literature on the subject carefully before making any kind of investment whatsoever. Crypto market predictions are speculative and any investment made shall be at the sole cost and risk of the readers.