Latest News

JP Morgan Chase Fined $4 Million by SEC: The Costly Consequences of Document Deletion

In a recent development, JP Morgan Chase, one of the largest financial institutions, has been hit with a significant fine of $4 million by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The imposition of such a penalty raises intriguing questions about the reasons behind this regulatory action. Let’s delve into the details to understand why this fine was imposed and its implications for JP Morgan Chase.

The SEC’s $4 Million Charge Against JP Morgan’s Wrongdoing

The SEC’s order issued against JP Morgan reveals that the fine is directed towards its subsidiary, JP Morgan Securities LLC. The enforcement action stems from the deletion of approximately 47 million electronic communications or emails across 8,700 inboxes during the period from January 1 to April 23, 2018.

The Fine and Its Justification

The imposed fine is primarily a result of JP Morgan’s failure to retain essential business records as mandated by the Exchange Act and Rule. While the offense relates to events that occurred five years ago, it is crucial to note that the charges are administrative rather than criminal in nature.

Unintentional Mistakes Leading to Deletion

The text of the SEC’s order highlights that JP Morgan had initiated a project in 2016 to delete outdated documents and communications, which were no longer required to be retained by law. However, during this process, the firm inadvertently deleted documents and communications that should have been preserved for a certain period. The SEC’s findings indicate glitches in the deletion tasks executed by JP Morgan employees, resulting in the failure to expunge the identified documents.

Retention Service Provider Failure

The SEC’s investigation revealed that the retention service provider employed by JP Morgan failed to apply the correct retention settings. As a consequence, a significant number of communications that should have been retained were permanently deleted and are now irrecoverable.

Costly Consequences for JP Morgan

Despite the seemingly trivial nature of the mistake, the repercussions for JP Morgan are substantial. The SEC has ordered the firm to pay a fine of $4 million to the Securities and Exchange Commission, which will be transferred to the US Treasury’s general fund. Failure to meet the payment deadline will incur additional interest charges. The penalty amount appears high considering the offense, but the SEC justifies it as being in the public interest.

Deliberate Violations and Potential Motives

JP Morgan’s deliberate violations of Sections 17(a) and 17a-4(b)(4) of the Exchange Act, which mandates the retention of communication records for at least three years, shed light on the motives behind the hefty fine. Prior to discussing the deliberate nature of the violations, the SEC reveals that JP Morgan had faced subpoenas and document requests in twelve securities-related investigations, with eight conducted by the SEC itself. The loss of communications from some of these investigations raises concerns. Furthermore, it appears that JP Morgan notified the SEC about the document loss in only one of the eight investigations.


The recent $4 million fine imposed on JP Morgan Chase by the SEC serves as a stark reminder of the importance of regulatory compliance and proper record retention. While the offense may have been administrative in nature, the implications and potential consequences of lost communications in ongoing and future investigations cannot be underestimated. JP Morgan’s inadvertent deletion of crucial documents, coupled with its failure to notify the SEC in a timely manner, has resulted in significant penalties and raised suspicions regarding the motives behind the deletions. This incident serves as a cautionary tale for financial institutions and emphasizes the need for strict adherence to regulatory guidelines and communication preservation protocols.


Crypto products and NFTs are unregulated and can be highly risky. There may be no regulatory recourse for any loss from such transactions. Crypto is not a legal tender and is subject to market risks. Readers are advised to seek expert advice and read offer document(s) along with related important literature on the subject carefully before making any kind of investment whatsoever. Crypto market predictions are speculative and any investment made shall be at the sole cost and risk of the readers.