WSJ: CoinEx Handled $3.8 Billion in Iran-Linked Crypto Funds, Raising Sanctions Concerns

A new report from The Wall Street Journal, citing data from blockchain analytics firm TRM Labs, has revealed that cryptocurrency exchange CoinEx has served as a primary conduit for over $3.84 billion in funds linked to Iran since 2019. The findings raise significant questions about the platform’s compliance with international sanctions and its role in facilitating financial flows from a state under heavy U.S. and global restrictions.

Billions in Transactions Tied to Sanctioned Entities

According to the report, CoinEx wallets were found to have transacted with funds previously hacked from Iran’s central bank. More concerning, the exchange also had direct dealings with wallets that the U.S. government has officially identified as belonging to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), a designated foreign terrorist organization. The sheer volume of the transactions—over 6 trillion South Korean won—highlights a sustained pattern of financial activity rather than isolated incidents.

Deep Ties to Iran’s Largest Crypto Exchange

The report further details that in 2024 alone, transaction volume between CoinEx and Nobitex, Iran’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, exceeded $763 million. This made CoinEx Nobitex’s primary overseas exchange partner, surpassing even global giant Binance. This relationship is particularly notable given the difficulty Iranian exchanges face in maintaining correspondent relationships with foreign platforms due to sanctions.

Exchange Founder Responds to Allegations

CoinEx founder Haipo Yang acknowledged that the exchange had a significant number of Iranian users but firmly denied any relationship with the Iranian government. He stated that CoinEx is now taking active measures to distance itself from the Iranian market, including blocking new user registrations from Iranian IP addresses. However, the report’s findings suggest that for years, the platform may have lacked the robust know-your-customer (KYC) and anti-money laundering (AML) controls necessary to prevent such large-scale sanctions exposure.

Implications for the Crypto Industry

This development underscores the ongoing tension between the decentralized, borderless nature of cryptocurrency and the strict territorial enforcement of international sanctions. For regulators in the U.S., South Korea, and elsewhere, the case of CoinEx serves as a critical example of how digital asset platforms can become unwitting—or negligent—channels for sanctioned states. For the industry, it reinforces the need for proactive compliance infrastructure to avoid becoming a liability in global financial security.

Conclusion

The WSJ report places CoinEx under intense scrutiny at a time when global regulators are increasingly focused on crypto’s role in illicit finance. While the exchange claims to be rectifying its exposure to Iran, the historical data suggests a deep and long-standing entanglement that may invite regulatory action and further investigation into its operational history.

FAQs

Q1: What specific sanctions violations are alleged against CoinEx?
The primary concern is that CoinEx facilitated transactions with entities linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and handled funds from a hack of Iran’s central bank, both of which fall under U.S. sanctions and terrorism financing regulations.

Q2: How does CoinEx compare to other exchanges in terms of Iran-linked volume?
According to TRM Labs data cited by the WSJ, CoinEx was the primary overseas partner for Iran’s largest exchange, Nobitex, surpassing Binance in transaction volume in 2024.

Q3: What actions is CoinEx taking in response to the report?
CoinEx founder Haipo Yang stated the exchange is blocking new sign-ups from Iranian IP addresses and taking measures to reduce its presence in the Iranian market, though the historical volume remains a point of concern.