In a surprising turn of events, Adobe and Figma have mutually agreed to terminate their planned merger, a deal initially valued at $20 billion. The decision comes after facing significant regulatory pushback in Europe, highlighting the increasing scrutiny tech giants face when attempting major acquisitions. What does this mean for the future of design software and the competitive landscape? Let’s dive in.
Adobe and Figma Call Off Acquisition: A Regulatory Roadblock
- European Regulations Halt the Deal: Adobe cites insurmountable regulatory hurdles in Europe as the primary reason for terminating the acquisition.
- Figma to Receive $1 Billion Fee: As part of the agreement, Figma will receive a substantial $1 billion termination fee from Adobe.
The official announcement, jointly released by both companies, underscores the challenges in securing necessary approvals from the European Commission and the U.K. Competition and Markets Authority.
See Also: Upland Partners With AI Studio Kaedim To Accelerate Metaverse Asset Production
Why Did the Deal Collapse? Adobe Blames Europe
The acquisition, initially unveiled in September of the previous year, raised eyebrows due to its sheer size and the potential elimination of a significant competitor in the design software market.
While the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) kept a close watch, no formal legal action was taken to block the deal in the United States. However, challenges mounted across the Atlantic.
The U.K. competition authority voiced concerns in late November about the acquisition’s potential to stifle innovation, leading to an in-depth investigation. The European Union (EU) had initiated a similar inquiry in August.
Regulators focused on the idea that Figma held a dominant position in interactive product design tools, even though Adobe offered different products. They argued that acquiring Figma would remove a key competitor and reduce innovation.
Dylan Field, CEO and co-founder of Figma, addressed the decision in a blog post, acknowledging the unsuccessful outcome despite their efforts to highlight the differences between their businesses to regulators worldwide. He stated, “It was not the outcome we had hoped for.”
See Also: Annoyed Investor Files Lawsuit Against Lido DAO Over Unfair Token Control
Figma Walks Away with $1 Billion: A Costly Termination
Field emphasized that despite extensive engagement with regulators globally, detailing the nuances of their businesses and markets, securing regulatory approval proved impossible.
As a result of the failed acquisition, Adobe is now obligated to pay Figma a termination fee of $1 billion, as outlined in their agreement.
This fee was contingent on the deal failing to receive regulatory clearance or not closing within 18 months of the initial announcement.
Although the 18-month deadline hadn’t passed, and no final decisions had been issued by regulators, both companies opted to abandon the deal.
Tom Smith, a former CMA legal director, explained that abandoning a deal before an inevitable prohibition is not unusual, as it prevents setting an adverse precedent and saves on legal costs.
Ultimately, Adobe’s pursuit of Figma ended due to regulatory hurdles in Europe, reflecting concerns about market dominance and potential harm to innovation. The $1 billion termination fee marks the end of a deal that faced increasing regulatory scrutiny and ultimately became unfeasible.
Disclaimer: The information provided is not trading advice. Bitcoinworld.co.in holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decisions.
Disclaimer: The information provided is not trading advice, Bitcoinworld.co.in holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decisions.