Crypto News News

Crypto Promoter and Failed Politician Michelle Bond Accused of Taking Illegal FTX Cash

Crypto Promoter and Failed Politician Michelle Bond Accused Of Taking Illegal FTX Cash

The intersection of cryptocurrency, politics, and alleged illegal activity has taken center stage with the indictment of Michelle Bond, a former crypto advocate and one-time Republican congressional candidate. Accusations of accepting illicit campaign funds from her then-boyfriend, FTX executive Ryan Salame, have cast a shadow over her past endeavors and ignited a debate about the role of digital assets in political campaigns. Let’s delve into the details of this unfolding saga.

Who is Michelle Bond?

Before finding herself in the midst of a legal storm, Michelle Bond carved out a career in both the regulatory and advocacy realms of the digital asset space. She previously served as a lawyer at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and later became the CEO of the Association for Digital Asset Markets (ADAM), a Washington-based crypto trade group. In 2022, Bond ventured into the political arena, launching a campaign for a U.S. House of Representatives seat in New York.

The Allegations: A River of FTX Cash?

The indictment against Bond centers on allegations that she accepted illegal campaign contributions from Ryan Salame, a former high-ranking executive at FTX, the now-collapsed cryptocurrency exchange. The core accusation is that Salame funneled money to Bond’s campaign, which she then falsely reported as self-funded. This is a violation of election rules, which require candidates using their own money to adhere to specific regulations.

Key points of the allegations include:

  • Illegal Handling of Donations: Bond is accused of illegally handling and accepting campaign donations tied to Salame.
  • False Ethics Documents: The indictment alleges that Bond filed ethics documents containing false claims about the source of her campaign funds.
  • Direct Payments: The indictment details instances where Bond allegedly received payments, some in the hundreds of thousands of dollars, from Salame.

An example cited in the indictment includes a text message from Bond to Salame, thanking him for paying a consulting firm invoice. Salame allegedly responded that the expenses related to her campaign would garner him significant favor.

Ryan Salame’s Role and Plea Deal

While not directly named in the initial court papers, Salame’s description matches that of the former CEO of FTX Digital Markets. He previously received a 7.5-year sentence in a plea deal related to campaign finance violations and running an unlicensed money transmitting business. Salame’s legal team now argues that his plea deal was intended to shield Bond from prosecution, a claim that will be addressed in a future hearing.

Campaign Finance: By the Numbers

According to Federal Election Commission records, Bond’s campaign raised over $1.5 million. The indictment alleges that a significant portion of this amount originated from payments made by Salame or FTX. Despite spending roughly the same amount as her Republican primary opponent and receiving substantial support from crypto industry advertising, Bond garnered less than 30% of the vote.

The Aftermath and Implications

Following the emergence of allegations regarding her financial ties to FTX, Bond resigned from her position as CEO of ADAM. The indictment and ongoing legal proceedings have broader implications for the cryptocurrency industry and its involvement in political campaigns. It raises questions about transparency, ethical conduct, and the potential for illicit funds to influence elections.

Key Takeaways

  • Michelle Bond, a former crypto advocate and SEC lawyer, has been indicted on charges of accepting illegal campaign contributions.
  • The alleged source of the illegal funds is Ryan Salame, a former FTX executive.
  • The indictment raises concerns about the role of cryptocurrency in political campaigns and the need for greater transparency.
  • Salame’s legal team claims his plea deal was intended to protect Bond.

The Michelle Bond case serves as a stark reminder of the potential pitfalls when the worlds of cryptocurrency and politics collide. As the legal proceedings unfold, the industry and the public will be watching closely, seeking answers and accountability.

Disclaimer: The information provided is not trading advice, Bitcoinworld.co.in holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decisions.