Coinbase CEO Exposes ‘Informal Pressure’ from RBI Behind India UPI Payment Halt: What’s Next for Crypto in India?

Frustration and uncertainty continue to plague the cryptocurrency landscape in India. Just weeks after its much-anticipated launch in India, global crypto exchange giant Coinbase faced an abrupt halt to its Unified Payments Interface (UPI) services. Now, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong has shed light on the real reason behind this disruption: ‘informal pressure’ from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI).

Coinbase India’s Rocky Start: A Promising Launch Cut Short

Remember the buzz around Coinbase finally entering the Indian market? It was a moment of excitement for Indian crypto enthusiasts and traders alike. Coinbase, a leading global crypto exchange, launched its services in India with a bang, aiming to tap into the burgeoning Indian crypto market. However, this promising start was short-lived. A mere three days after launch, UPI payments, a crucial payment gateway for Indian users, were disabled on the platform, effectively putting a brake on Coinbase’s operations in the country.

Armstrong’s Revelation: RBI’s ‘Shadow Ban’ Tactics

In a recent earnings call, Brian Armstrong didn’t mince words. He openly admitted that the halt of UPI services wasn’t due to any technical glitch or misunderstanding. Instead, it was a direct result of ‘informal pressure’ exerted by the RBI through state banks. Armstrong stated, “We launched in India, and then almost immediately we had to disable UPI because of some pressure from, in effect, the Reserve Bank of India… indirectly via the payment processors.”

This revelation isn’t entirely surprising to those familiar with the complex relationship between the Indian government and the crypto industry. Despite a landmark Supreme Court ruling in 2020 that overturned the RBI’s blanket ban on crypto banking, the central bank’s stance on cryptocurrencies remains lukewarm, if not outright hostile.

Armstrong further elaborated, “There are elements in the government there, especially at Reserve Bank of India (RBI), who are not as positive on crypto as we are or even as positive as the Supreme Court of India. And so, they’re applying soft pressure behind the scenes to try to disable some of these payments, which might be going through UPI.”

The Lingering ‘Shadow Ban’ on Indian Crypto Exchanges

Armstrong’s comments highlight a persistent issue faced by crypto businesses in India – a ‘shadow ban’ by the RBI. Even after the Supreme Court’s favorable verdict, Indian crypto exchanges have consistently struggled with accessing smooth banking and payment processing facilities. This ‘informal pressure’ creates an uncertain and challenging environment for the crypto industry to thrive in India.

Here’s a breakdown of the situation:

• Supreme Court Ruling (2020): The Supreme Court of India overturned the RBI’s 2018 ban on banks dealing with crypto businesses, deeming it unconstitutional. This was seen as a major victory for the Indian crypto industry.
• RBI’s Continued Reservations: Despite the Supreme Court order, the RBI has maintained a cautious stance on cryptocurrencies, citing concerns about financial stability, money laundering, and investor protection.
• ‘Informal Pressure’ Tactics: Armstrong’s statement reveals that the RBI is allegedly using ‘informal pressure’ tactics, possibly through state-owned banks and payment processors, to indirectly restrict crypto-related transactions.
• Impact on Crypto Exchanges: This ‘shadow ban’ creates operational hurdles for crypto exchanges, limiting their ability to offer seamless services to Indian users, particularly in terms of deposits and withdrawals.

Is RBI in Contempt of the Supreme Court Order?

Armstrong directly points out the apparent contradiction between the RBI’s actions and the Supreme Court’s ruling. He argues that the RBI’s ‘soft pressure’ tactics are a violation of the spirit, if not the letter, of the Supreme Court’s 2020 order. This raises a critical question: Is the RBI effectively undermining the Supreme Court’s decision through indirect means?

The situation is complex. While the Supreme Court struck down the blanket ban, it didn’t explicitly mandate the RBI to facilitate crypto transactions. This ambiguity seems to be exploited by the RBI to maintain its restrictive approach.

Coinbase’s Path Forward in India: Cooperation Over Confrontation

Despite the setbacks and criticisms, Armstrong emphasized Coinbase’s commitment to the Indian market and its preference for a collaborative approach. He stated that Coinbase aims to work constructively with regulators to find a way to relaunch UPI payments and operate smoothly in India.

This indicates a pragmatic approach from Coinbase. Instead of engaging in a direct confrontation with the RBI, which could be counterproductive, Coinbase seems to be opting for dialogue and negotiation to navigate the regulatory complexities.

Coinbase’s Stance: Key Takeaways

• Commitment to India: Coinbase remains invested in the Indian market despite the initial challenges.
• Desire for Collaboration: The exchange prefers to work with regulators, including the RBI, to find a sustainable path forward.
• Focus on Relaunching UPI: Restoring UPI payments is a priority for Coinbase to provide convenient access for Indian users.
• Long-Term Vision: Coinbase seems to be taking a long-term view, understanding that navigating the regulatory landscape in India may take time and persistent effort.

The Future of Crypto in India: Navigating Regulatory Uncertainty

Coinbase’s experience in India underscores the ongoing regulatory uncertainty surrounding cryptocurrencies in the country. While the Supreme Court has provided some legal clarity, the RBI’s reservations and actions indicate a continued struggle for the crypto industry to gain mainstream acceptance and operate without hindrances.

For Indian crypto traders and investors, this situation highlights the need for:

• Regulatory Clarity: Clear and consistent regulations are crucial for the long-term growth and stability of the crypto market in India.
• Dialogue and Collaboration: Constructive dialogue between the crypto industry, regulators, and the government is essential to address concerns and find balanced solutions.
• Innovation and Adaptation: Crypto businesses need to be innovative and adaptable to navigate the evolving regulatory landscape and find ways to serve the Indian market effectively.

Conclusion: A Wait-and-See Approach for Coinbase and Crypto in India

The Coinbase-RBI saga is a stark reminder of the regulatory tightrope walk for crypto companies in India. While Coinbase’s CEO has brought the issue of ‘informal pressure’ to the forefront, the path ahead remains uncertain. Whether Coinbase can successfully collaborate with the RBI to relaunch UPI payments and whether the Indian government will move towards a more crypto-friendly regulatory framework are questions that remain unanswered.

For now, it’s a wait-and-see situation for Coinbase India and the broader crypto ecosystem in the country. The industry will be keenly observing how this situation unfolds and whether it will pave the way for a more constructive and clear regulatory environment for cryptocurrencies in India.

Related Posts – This was a major factor in Bitcoin’s (BTC) drop to $35,000