Japan Crypto ETF Delay Sparks Urgent Warning: SBI CEO Slams 2028 Timeline as ‘Too Late’

TOKYO, JAPAN – A stark warning from a leading Japanese financial executive has ignited a crucial debate about the nation’s pace in the global cryptocurrency race. SBI Global Asset Management CEO Asakura Tomoya has publicly criticized Japan’s reported 2028 timeline for approving spot cryptocurrency exchange-traded funds (ETFs), labeling the planned schedule as dangerously “too late.” This urgent critique, delivered via social media platform X, responds directly to a Nikkei Shimbun report outlining the Financial Services Agency’s (FSA) expected regulatory pathway. Asakura argues that this cautious approach threatens to leave Japan lagging behind major economic rivals, including the United States and China, in the rapidly evolving digital asset landscape. The CEO’s forceful comments underscore a growing tension between traditional regulatory prudence and the breakneck speed of fintech innovation.

Japan Crypto ETF Ambitions Face Critical Scrutiny

The core of the controversy centers on a specific financial product: the spot cryptocurrency ETF. Unlike futures-based ETFs, which track derivative contracts, a spot ETF holds the actual underlying digital asset, such as Bitcoin. This structure provides direct exposure for investors without the complexities of managing private keys or using cryptocurrency exchanges. The Nikkei Shimbun report, which triggered Asakura’s response, indicated that Japan’s FSA is methodically working toward a framework that would permit trading of these instruments by 2028. Furthermore, the report suggested accompanying tax reforms aimed at clarifying the treatment of crypto assets. However, for industry leaders like Asakura, this four-year horizon represents a critical failure to match global momentum.

Consequently, market observers note a significant gap emerging between Japan’s regulatory planning and real-world developments elsewhere. The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved multiple spot Bitcoin ETFs in early 2024, leading to an influx of billions in institutional capital. Similarly, other Asian financial hubs, including Hong Kong, have launched their own spot crypto ETFs. This global context forms the backbone of Asakura’s argument. He contends that Japan’s proposed timeline is not merely slow but strategically misaligned, potentially ceding financial innovation leadership and associated economic benefits to competitors. The delay could impact capital flows, talent retention, and Japan’s position as a forward-looking financial center.

Global Regulatory Race and Competitive Pressures

The push for cryptocurrency ETFs represents more than a niche financial product launch; it symbolizes a broader shift in institutional acceptance. When a major regulator like the U.S. SEC approves such products, it signals a level of maturity and oversight that attracts conservative capital. Japan, with its historically robust and conservative financial regulatory framework, has often moved deliberately. The FSA’s approach to crypto has evolved from initial warnings to a licensed exchange system following the infamous Mt. Gox hack. This history informs its current cautious stance, prioritizing investor protection and systemic stability above first-mover advantage.

Nevertheless, the competitive landscape is shifting rapidly. The following table illustrates the divergent regulatory postures among key economies regarding spot crypto ETFs as of early 2025:

As this comparison shows, Japan’s projected timeline places it years behind other developed markets. Asakura’s warning specifically highlights the risk from China, where, despite a ban on cryptocurrency trading, the state is aggressively advancing its central bank digital currency (CBDC) and blockchain infrastructure. This suggests competition is not limited to Western markets but is intensely regional.

Expert Analysis on Market Impact and Investor Sentiment

Financial analysts monitoring the Asia-Pacific region point to several immediate consequences of a delayed approval. Firstly, domestic capital seeking regulated crypto exposure may flow to overseas markets or products, resulting in a loss of taxable revenue and trading activity for Japanese exchanges. Secondly, Japanese financial institutions like SBI, which have invested heavily in blockchain ventures and digital asset exchanges, face a competitive disadvantage. They cannot offer locally regulated products that their global peers already provide. Thirdly, the delay affects retail and institutional investor sentiment, potentially framing Japan’s market as less innovative.

Moreover, the proposed tax reforms are a critical piece of the puzzle. Japan’s current tax code treats cryptocurrency as “miscellaneous income,” subject to progressive rates up to 55% on profits. This has been a significant deterrent for professional traders and investors. The promised reform, tied to the 2028 ETF timeline, aims to create a more favorable environment. However, experts argue that decoupling tax reform from ETF approval could accelerate progress. Implementing clearer, lower tax rates sooner could stimulate the domestic market independently, building a stronger foundation for when ETFs eventually launch.

The Path Forward for Japanese Cryptocurrency Adoption

Asakura’s public critique is not an isolated voice but reflects a growing chorus within Japan’s financial technology sector. The call is for regulatory agility—a principle where frameworks can adapt swiftly to technological change without compromising core safeguards. Proponents suggest a phased or pilot approach for spot crypto ETFs, similar to regulatory sandboxes used for other fintech innovations. This would allow the FSA to monitor risks in a controlled environment while enabling market participants to gain experience.

Key arguments for accelerating the timeline include:

• Institutional Demand: Japanese pension funds, insurers, and asset managers are increasingly seeking diversified digital asset exposure through regulated channels.
• Technological Leadership: Japan boasts strong blockchain developer communities and fintech companies; delayed regulation stifles their growth and export potential.
• Consumer Protection Paradox: By not offering regulated domestic products, authorities may inadvertently push investors toward riskier, unregulated offshore platforms.
• Economic Revitalization: A dynamic digital asset sector could attract foreign investment and talent, supporting broader economic goals.

The FSA now faces a complex balancing act. It must weigh Asakura’s urgent warning against its mandate to ensure market stability and protect investors. The agency’s next moves will be closely scrutinized by global investors and policymakers alike. Will it hold firm to a meticulous, multi-year plan, or will competitive pressures catalyze a more accelerated review process? The decision will significantly shape Japan’s financial landscape for the next decade.

Conclusion

The debate over Japan’s crypto ETF timeline, forcefully highlighted by SBI CEO Asakura Tomoya, transcends a simple regulatory schedule. It strikes at the heart of how a major economy navigates the disruptive force of digital assets. While the Financial Services Agency’s deliberate approach is rooted in a commendable history of investor protection, the global market is moving at an unprecedented pace. The reported 2028 target for spot cryptocurrency ETF approval risks cementing Japan as a follower rather than a leader in the next era of finance. As Asakura contends, the cost of being “too late” may not just be measured in delayed product launches but in diminished influence, capital flight, and a missed opportunity to shape the future of digital finance. The coming months will reveal whether this urgent warning prompts a strategic recalibration.

FAQs

Q1: What is a spot cryptocurrency ETF?
A spot cryptocurrency ETF is a regulated investment fund traded on traditional stock exchanges. It directly holds the underlying digital asset, like Bitcoin, allowing investors to gain exposure without personally buying, storing, or securing the crypto themselves.

Q2: Why does the SBI CEO think Japan’s 2028 timeline is too slow?
Asakura argues that by 2028, Japan will be years behind other major financial markets like the U.S., Canada, and Hong Kong, which have already approved such products. This delay could cause Japan to lose competitive advantage, investment, and influence in the growing digital asset economy.

Q3: What is the role of Japan’s Financial Services Agency (FSA) in this process?
The FSA is Japan’s primary financial regulatory body. It is responsible for developing the rules, oversight framework, and investor protections necessary to approve new financial products like spot crypto ETFs, ensuring market stability and integrity.

Q4: How do Japan’s current cryptocurrency tax rules affect this issue?
Japan taxes cryptocurrency profits as “miscellaneous income” at rates up to 55%. This high tax burden is seen as a barrier to adoption. The proposed reforms, tied to the ETF timeline, aim to create a more favorable tax regime to encourage regulated market participation.

Q5: What are the potential risks of accelerating the approval of crypto ETFs?
Risks include potential market volatility, inadequate investor education, insufficient custody safeguards for the underlying assets, and the possibility of exacerbating financial systemic risk if the products are not properly structured and regulated from the outset.