- Major US banks want the SEC to change rules for crypto so they can handle Bitcoin ETFs.
- They say current rules make it costly for them to offer crypto services.
- Bitcoin ETFs have $4 billion in investments, but banks are not involved yet.
Major banking institutions in the US are lobbying the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to reevaluate its crypto asset definition, aiming to secure a more prominent role in the burgeoning cryptocurrency market.
This push comes after the recent approval of spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs), which notably excluded American banks as asset custodians.
Banking Industry Advocacy For Regulatory Adjustment
A coalition comprising the Bank Policy Institute, American Bankers Association, Financial Services Forum, and Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association has penned a letter to SEC Chair Gary Gensler, emphasizing the absence of US banks as custodians for the approved Bitcoin ETFs.
See Also: Coinbase Named As ‘Custodian In 5 Of 8 Ethereum ETF Applications’ As Revenue Jumped 45%
The group urges the SEC to revise Staff Accounting Bulletin 121 (SAB 121), issued in March 2022, which governs the accounting treatment of crypto asset custody obligations.
The coalition suggests narrowing the definition of crypto assets outlined in SAB 121 to exclude traditional assets recorded on blockchain technology.
This proposed change aims to prevent assets like tokenized deposits from falling under stringent crypto guidance.
Moreover, the group advocates for exempting banks from the requirement to hold crypto assets on their balance sheets, which they argue is costly and impedes their ability to offer crypto custody services at scale.
However, they stress the importance of maintaining disclosure requirements to ensure transparency for investors.
Market Response And Observations
Matt Hougan, Chief Investment Officer at Bitwise, interprets the coalition’s letter as indicative of a shift in Washington’s regulatory stance towards crypto assets, particularly in light of the approval of Bitcoin ETFs.
Meanwhile, Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas notes that US banks are interested in participating in the digital finance wave, evidenced by their efforts to secure roles in the crypto custodianship sphere.
US banks, left off key bitcoin ETF roles, are pushing SEC to tweak guidance around holding digital assets. A bank trade gp coalition sent SEC letter asking them exclude ETFs from broad crypto umbrella. They want a piece of the action. I don't blame them, it isn't fair.… pic.twitter.com/advPa94nK2
— Eric Balchunas (@EricBalchunas) February 15, 2024
Additional commentary from industry insiders suggests growing frustration among bankers over their exclusion from facilitating spot Bitcoin ETFs for customers.
Despite the absence of US banks as custodians, newly launched spot Bitcoin ETFs have seen substantial investor interest, with preliminary data from Farside indicating aggregate inflows surpassing $4 billion.
This influx of funds into Bitcoin ETFs comes with an acceleration in outflows from Grayscale, a prominent digital currency asset manager.
The sector’s appeal to the SEC for reevaluating crypto asset regulations underscores the evolving landscape of digital finance and the increasing integration of traditional financial institutions into the crypto market.
See Also: Spot Bitcoin ETFs Contribute 5% To Robinhood’s Crypto Trading Volume
As stakeholders await regulatory decisions, the performance of Bitcoin ETFs and the broader cryptocurrency market will continue to be closely monitored by investors and industry observers alike.
Disclaimer: The information provided is not trading nor financial advice. Bitcoinworld.co.in holds no liability for any trading or investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any trading or investment decisions.
#Binance #WRITE2EARN
Disclaimer: The information provided is not trading advice, Bitcoinworld.co.in holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decisions.