Revolut US Bank License: Strategic Pivot Signals Ambitious 2025 Expansion for Cryptocurrency Services

In a significant strategic shift, London-based financial technology giant Revolut is now actively pursuing a de novo bank charter from the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, according to a May 2025 Financial Times report. This move marks a pivotal evolution in the neobank’s long-standing ambition to deepen its footprint in the lucrative United States market, particularly for its cryptocurrency offerings. Initially exploring acquisition routes, Revolut’s decision to seek a license directly underscores the complex regulatory landscape and the firm’s commitment to a controlled, compliant expansion.

Revolut’s Strategic Pivot to a US Bank License

The Financial Times report, citing knowledgeable sources, reveals that Revolut has withdrawn earlier plans to acquire an existing U.S. bank. Consequently, the company now focuses its efforts on obtaining a license from the OCC, the federal agency that charters, regulates, and supervises national banks. This regulatory pathway, while rigorous, offers distinct advantages. A federal charter would allow Revolut to operate uniformly across state lines, bypassing the need for individual state-by-state money transmitter licenses. Furthermore, it provides a stable, recognized framework for launching integrated banking and cryptocurrency services.

Industry analysts view this pivot as a calculated response to several factors. First, the market for suitable acquisition targets has become competitive and expensive. Second, regulatory scrutiny of bank mergers, especially those involving fintech firms with substantial crypto operations, has intensified. Finally, securing its own license affords Revolut greater control over its technology stack, customer experience, and strategic roadmap. This control is crucial for a company that built its reputation on seamless digital integration.

The Complex Landscape of US Banking and Crypto Regulation

Revolut’s pursuit occurs within a rapidly evolving and often fragmented U.S. regulatory environment. The OCC has historically taken a cautious yet evolving stance on cryptocurrency activities for the banks it supervises. Under previous leadership, the agency issued interpretive letters allowing national banks to hold crypto assets and use stablecoins for payment activities. However, subsequent guidance has emphasized the need for robust risk management.

For a neobank like Revolut, which has offered cryptocurrency trading, custody, and transfer services in other markets, navigating this terrain is paramount. A federal bank charter would subject its entire U.S. operation, including crypto services, to OCC oversight. This could streamline compliance but also imposes stringent capital, liquidity, and consumer protection requirements. The table below outlines key regulatory considerations for Revolut’s application:

Simultaneously, other global neobanks have taken different paths. For instance, Germany’s N26 entered the U.S. with a more limited product set before ultimately withdrawing. Conversely, Brazil’s Nubank expanded through acquisitions. Revolut’s chosen path suggests a commitment to a full-service, long-term presence, betting that the regulatory clarity of a bank charter outweighs the speed of an acquisition.

Expert Analysis on Market Entry Strategies

Financial technology experts note that this shift from acquisition to organic licensing is becoming more common. “The acquisition route provides immediate infrastructure but often comes with legacy technology and cultural integration challenges,” explains Dr. Anya Petrova, a fintech regulation professor at Stanford University. “A de novo application, while slower, allows a digitally-native firm like Revolut to design its U.S. entity from the ground up, fully integrating its crypto and banking platforms under one regulatory roof. This is likely a 24- to 36-month process, but the end product could be more competitive.”

The impact of a successful application would be substantial. For U.S. consumers, it could mean access to Revolut’s signature app-based banking alongside its cryptocurrency exchange and wallet services from a federally-regulated entity. For the market, it would signal regulators’ growing comfort with mature fintech models. It also pressures traditional U.S. banks to accelerate their own digital and crypto offerings. Revolut’s move is not happening in isolation; it reflects a broader maturation of the fintech sector where sustainable growth requires deep regulatory engagement.

Revolut’s Global Context and Cryptocurrency Ambitions

Founded in 2015, Revolut has grown into one of Europe’s most valuable fintech companies, offering multi-currency accounts, stock trading, and cryptocurrency services to over 35 million customers worldwide. The United States represents a critical, yet challenging, frontier. The company launched a limited U.S. service in 2020 through a partnership with a domestic bank, offering USD accounts and debit cards, but its full crypto suite remained unavailable.

A federal bank license would fundamentally change this dynamic. It would enable Revolut to directly offer insured deposit accounts, lend capital, and potentially integrate crypto trading, savings, and payment products more deeply. The company has consistently highlighted crypto as a core growth pillar. In its European markets, users can buy, sell, and hold dozens of cryptocurrencies directly within the app. Translating this success to the U.S. requires a regulatory structure that supports innovation while ensuring security.

Key elements of Revolut’s crypto strategy likely hinge on this license:

• Integrated Finance: Seamlessly blending traditional banking, investment, and cryptocurrency holdings in one interface.
• Compliance Scale: Applying its automated compliance and fraud detection systems to meet OCC standards.
• Stablecoin Innovation: Potentially utilizing or issuing payment stablecoins for faster, cheaper cross-border transfers—a service popular with its global user base.

This expansion drive comes as regulators worldwide, including the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority, have granted Revolut a banking license in its home market. Securing a U.S. charter would create a powerful transatlantic banking and crypto platform, uniquely positioning Revolut against both traditional banks and pure-play crypto exchanges.

Conclusion

Revolut’s reported pivot to seeking a U.S. bank license from the OCC is a definitive strategic maneuver with far-reaching implications. This decision moves the company from a market-entry shortcut to building a foundational, regulated presence aligned with its long-term cryptocurrency ambitions. The path is complex and will test Revolut’s regulatory expertise and patience. However, success would grant the neobank a powerful platform to redefine integrated digital finance for American consumers, merging everyday banking with the evolving world of digital assets. As the fintech landscape consolidates, Revolut’s pursuit of this Revolut US bank license will serve as a key case study in how innovative financial companies navigate maturity and regulation on the global stage.

FAQs

Q1: What is the OCC, and why is its license important for Revolut?
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) is a U.S. Treasury bureau that charters and supervises national banks. A license from the OCC would allow Revolut to operate as a bank across all states, offer FDIC-insured accounts, and potentially streamline the offering of its cryptocurrency services under a single federal regulator.

Q2: Why did Revolut change its strategy from acquiring a bank to seeking a new license?
According to reports, Revolut found the acquisition route less favorable due to high costs, regulatory hurdles for mergers, and integration challenges with legacy systems. Seeking a de novo (new) license provides more control to build a tailored, technology-first bank aligned with its crypto services.

Q3: How would a U.S. bank license affect Revolut’s cryptocurrency services for American customers?
It could enable Revolut to offer its full suite of crypto trading, custody, and payment services directly within its U.S. banking app. Currently, its U.S. crypto offerings are limited. A charter would integrate these services under OCC oversight, subject to strict compliance but with greater operational freedom.

Q4: How long does it typically take to get an OCC bank charter?
The process is lengthy and rigorous, often taking between 18 to 36 months. It involves detailed business plans, capital raising to meet minimum requirements, extensive background checks on principals, and demonstrating robust risk management systems, especially for novel activities like crypto.

Q5: What are the main challenges Revolut might face in obtaining this license?
Key challenges include meeting high capital requirements, satisfying the OCC on its risk management for cryptocurrency activities, navigating the complex U.S. regulatory landscape for crypto, and potentially addressing scrutiny due to its foreign ownership and global operational scale.