ZKasino Accused of $33 Million ‘Fraud’ as User Funds Diverted to Lido, Sparking Investor Fury

The crypto world is once again ablaze with controversy, and this time, the spotlight is on blockchain gambling platform ZKasino. Imagine investing your hard-earned crypto into a platform with promises of returns, only to find out things have taken a sharp, unexpected turn. That’s exactly what’s happening with ZKasino, as accusations of fraud are flying after a staggering $33 million in investor and user funds were rerouted to the Lido staking protocol.

What Happened to the $33 Million? The ZKasino Uproar Explained

ZKasino launched with a bang, boasting a shiny new network and attracting over 10,000 users. These users, eager to get in on the action, bridged a significant 10,515 Ether (ETH) to the platform. The expectation? These funds were meant to be the lifeblood of the ZKasino ecosystem. In return for their ETH, users received ZKasino’s native ZKAS tokens.

Here’s where the plot twist hits:

• The Diverted Funds: Instead of utilizing the bridged ETH as anticipated, ZKasino made a controversial move. They channeled the entire $33 million sum into Lido, a well-known staking protocol.
• The Discounted Conversion: Adding insult to injury, ZKasino didn’t just hold onto the ETH. They converted it to ZKAS tokens at a “discounted rate of $0.055.” This conversion comes with a 15-month vesting schedule, meaning users can’t even access their tokens immediately.
• Broken Promises: The initial pitch? Users expected their ETH back. However, ZKasino’s tune changed dramatically. They justified these drastic changes as a “favour” to ensure a “seamless transition” to their chain, claiming it doesn’t utilize ETH.

This sudden shift in strategy and the lack of transparency ignited a firestorm of criticism and accusations of foul play.

Investor Outrage and Exit Scam Accusations

Trust is paramount in the crypto space, and ZKasino’s actions have severely eroded user confidence. The red flags started waving when users noticed changes on the ZKasino website. Gone were the previous guarantees of ETH returns, replaced with vague explanations and justifications.

The crypto community on platforms like X (formerly Twitter) erupted with outrage. Users, feeling betrayed, voiced their concerns and suspicions:

• Exit Scam Claims: The most serious accusation leveled against ZKasino is that it’s an exit scam – a fraudulent scheme where a project disappears with investors’ funds.
• Personal Details Shared: Furious users even went as far as sharing personal details of ZKasino’s founder, known as “Derivatives Monke,” in an attempt to initiate legal action.

See Also: Crypto Market Stumbles After The Arrest Of Samourai’s CEO And CTO

Technological Scrutiny: Is ZKasino’s Blockchain Just a Facade?

Adding fuel to the fire, anonymous developer “cygaar” stepped forward with scathing criticism of ZKasino’s underlying technology. According to cygaar’s analysis, the blockchain isn’t the groundbreaking innovation it was purported to be.

Here’s the breakdown of the tech concerns:

• “Arbitrum Nitro Chain”: Cygaar claims the ZKasino blockchain is simply an “Arbitrum Nitro chain that took 2 minutes to deploy.” This suggests a lack of original development and raises questions about the project’s technical sophistication.
• Missing Promised Tech: The promised zero-knowledge (ZK) technology and EigenDA, which are often touted for scalability and security, are allegedly absent from the current implementation.

These technical criticisms further deepen the suspicion surrounding ZKasino’s legitimacy and long-term viability.

Venture Capital Backlash: Big Brain VC Denies Investment

The fallout from the ZKasino controversy has extended to the venture capital world. ZKasino had previously claimed to have secured a Series A funding round at a hefty $350 million valuation, citing notable firms like MEXC and Big Brain Holdings as investors. However, Big Brain VC swiftly refuted these claims.

In a public statement on X, Big Brain VC clarified that they “never invested in ZKasino.” This public denial casts a shadow over ZKasino’s claims of investor backing and financial stability.

MEXC Distances Itself, Claims to be a “Victim”

Adding another layer to the unfolding drama, crypto exchange MEXC, also implicated as an investor by ZKasino, has distanced itself from the project’s controversial actions.

TechFlow reported MEXC’s statement on April 21, where the exchange emphasized that it was “just one of the investors” and positioned itself as a “victim” of ZKasino’s decisions, rather than a collaborator in the alleged wrongdoing. This statement suggests a potential rift between ZKasino and at least one of its purported investors.

Silence and Defiance: Derivatives Monke’s Cryptic Response

Amidst the escalating chaos and user fury, ZKasino and its founder, Derivatives Monke, have largely remained silent. Their communication has been minimal, limited to sporadic updates and terse responses to criticism on X.

Despite the intense pressure and accusations, Derivatives Monke continues to maintain a presence on the platform, even hinting at a commitment to “keep building.” This seemingly defiant stance could be interpreted as an attempt to project an image of normalcy and resilience in the face of mounting controversy.

The Road Ahead for ZKasino: Damage Control or Downfall?

The ZKasino saga is a stark reminder of the risks inherent in the crypto space. The diversion of $33 million in user funds to Lido, coupled with accusations of broken promises, technological shortcomings, and potential investor misrepresentation, has placed ZKasino in a precarious position.

Key Takeaways from the ZKasino Controversy:

• Transparency is Crucial: The lack of clear communication and the sudden shift in ZKasino’s plans fueled user distrust and anger.
• Due Diligence is Essential: Investors and users must conduct thorough research before committing funds to any crypto platform, regardless of purported backers or promises.
• Accountability Matters: The crypto community is increasingly demanding accountability from projects and founders, and ZKasino is facing the full force of this scrutiny.

Whether ZKasino can recover from this crisis remains to be seen. The project faces a monumental challenge in regaining user trust and addressing the serious allegations leveled against it. The coming days and weeks will be critical in determining ZKasino’s fate and the long-term impact of this controversy on the broader crypto gambling landscape.

Disclaimer: The information provided is not trading advice. Bitcoinworld.co.in holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decisions.

#Binance #WRITE2EARN