- Consensys continues to pursue the lawsuit against the SEC for clearer regulatory guidelines in the cryptocurrency sector.
- The SEC’s recent approval of Ethereum spot ETFs has sparked discussions over Ether’s classification.
- Consensys SEC lawsuit aims to address regulatory ambiguities surrounding cryptocurrencies.
Consensys, a prominent Ethereum software company, persists in its legal battle against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) despite the conclusion of the agency’s investigation into Ethereum 2.0.
Consensys SEC Lawsuit Continues for Cryptocurrency Clarity
Seeking clearer regulatory guidelines for the cryptocurrency sector, head of litigation at Coinsensys, Laura Brookover, said that the. Consensys SEC lawsuit for clarity is ongoing.
In an interview with CNBC on June 21, Brookover highlighted that while the SEC wrapped up its Ethereum 2.0 probe, it failed to provide definitive regulatory clarity regarding Ethereum’s classification. She affirmed Consensys’ commitment to advocate for clearer rules governing digital assets.
Brookover disclosed ongoing SEC investigations into Consensys’ MetaMask wallet, specifically concerning potential violations of securities laws related to swap and staking features.
The SEC had previously issued a Wells notice signaling its intention to take enforcement action on these matters.
SEC Approval of Ethereum ETFs Sparks Regulatory Debate
Following the SEC’s recent approval of spot Ethereum ETFs, Consensys submitted a letter questioning how this decision impacts the ongoing investigations.
The company underscored that these ETFs were approved under the premise of Ether being treated as a commodity.
The conclusion of the SEC’s Ethereum 2.0 investigation has sparked debates over Ether’s security classification and its implications for other cryptocurrencies.
Consensys SEC lawsuit aims to tackle these regulatory uncertainties head-on. The agency has not yet responded to Consensys’ drastic action.
