Kraken’s parent company, Payward, has secured a $22 million arbitration award against its former auditor, the global accounting firm Mazars, following a dispute over a halted 2022 audit. The ruling, reported by Cointelegraph, stems from Payward’s claim that Mazars unilaterally stopped its audit work just as it was nearing completion, causing significant financial harm.
Dispute Over Halted Audit
Payward argued that an audit is not a favor but a fundamental requirement for corporate survival, comparing it to ‘oxygen for corporate survival.’ The company stated that the audit was essential for accessing banking services, obtaining necessary licenses, and maintaining critical business relationships. Mazars’ decision to walk away, according to Payward, was part of a broader pattern of pressure on the crypto industry, which the company described as Operation Choke Point 2.0 — a measure aimed at restricting the sector’s access to banking services.
Broader Implications for Crypto
The case highlights ongoing tensions between cryptocurrency firms and traditional financial and auditing institutions. Payward asserted that the abrupt termination of the audit resulted in millions of dollars in losses, as it hindered the company’s ability to operate normally and secure essential services. Kraken co-CEO Arjun Sethi has now petitioned a Delaware court to confirm the arbitration award, moving to enforce the decision legally.
Industry Context
This dispute is not isolated. The crypto industry has frequently raised concerns about what it views as coordinated efforts by regulators and financial institutions to limit its access to the banking system. The term ‘Operation Choke Point 2.0’ references historical U.S. government initiatives that targeted industries perceived as high-risk, including payday lenders and firearm dealers. Crypto firms argue that similar tactics are now being applied to digital asset companies, making it harder for them to secure basic financial services.
Conclusion
The $22 million arbitration award against Mazars represents a significant legal victory for Kraken’s parent company, but the underlying issues of banking access and regulatory pressure on the crypto industry remain unresolved. The case serves as a reminder of the ongoing friction between the traditional financial system and the digital asset sector, with potential implications for how auditors and banks engage with crypto firms in the future.
FAQs
Q1: What was the basis of Payward’s claim against Mazars?
Payward claimed that Mazars unilaterally halted its 2022 audit just before completion, causing significant financial losses and hindering access to banking and licensing.
Q2: What is Operation Choke Point 2.0?
It is a term used by some in the crypto industry to describe what they believe is a coordinated effort by regulators and banks to restrict crypto companies’ access to financial services.
Q3: What happens next in this case?
Kraken co-CEO Arjun Sethi has petitioned a Delaware court to confirm the arbitration award, which would legally enforce the $22 million payment from Mazars to Payward.
Disclaimer: The information provided is not trading advice, Bitcoinworld.co.in holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decisions.

