Meta In Copyright Lawsuit With Book Authors Over AI Training Practices
Latest News News

Meta In Copyright Lawsuit With Book Authors Over AI Training Practices

  • Meta Platforms is currently facing a lawsuit for using copyrighted books without permission from authors to train its AI language model, Llama.
  • Chat logs suggest Meta knew about legal risks but used the content for AI training.
  • The lawsuit could impact AI industry practices, especially in how companies source and disclose data for AI model training.

Meta Platforms, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, is currently facing a significant legal battle. 

Some authors, including comedian Sarah Silverman and Pulitzer Prize winner Michael Chabon, have consolidated their lawsuits against Meta, alleging the unauthorized use of their copyrighted works. 

These authors assert that Meta used their books without permission to train its artificial intelligence language model, Llama.

See Also: AMD Launches Instinct MI300 Series To Compete In The AI Accelerator Market

Details Of The Lawsuit

The lawsuit, filed on December 11, intensifies the scrutiny over Meta’s practices in developing AI technologies. A critical component of the lawsuit is the inclusion of chat logs from a Meta-affiliated researcher. 

These logs, discussed in a Discord server, suggest that Meta was aware its use of the books might contravene U.S. copyright law. 

Researcher Tim Dettmers, a doctoral student at the University of Washington, is quoted in these logs discussing the legal implications of using copyrighted materials as training data for AI models.

In 2021, Dettmers mentioned discussions with Meta’s legal department regarding the legality of using book files for training. The logs reveal that Meta’s lawyers had expressed concerns about using such data, indicating a potential awareness of the legal risks involved.

Impact on the AI Industry

This lawsuit comes amidst a growing number of legal challenges faced by tech companies over their use of copyrighted content to train generative AI models. 

These models, which have gained global attention and spurred substantial investment, are being scrutinized for their data-sourcing practices. 

The outcome of these cases could significantly influence the generative AI landscape, potentially increasing the costs of developing AI models by requiring compensation for content creators.

Moreover, emerging AI regulations in Europe could compel companies to disclose their training data, further exposing them to legal risks. This legal environment is increasingly becoming a concern for AI developers and the tech industry.

See Also: Take Note! Google Has Announced To Change Its Cryptocurrency Ad Policy

Meta’s Llama Models And Training Data Disclosure

Meta released the first version of its Llama language model in February, detailing the datasets used for its training, which included the “Books3 section of ThePile.” 

This dataset reportedly contains 196,640 books. However, for its latest version, Llama 2, released for commercial use in the summer, Meta has not disclosed the training data used.

Llama 2, offered freely to companies with fewer than 700 million monthly active users, has been seen as a potential disruptor in the generative AI software market. It poses a challenge to established players like OpenAI and Google, who charge for using their models.

The lawsuit against Meta Platforms highlights the complex legal and ethical issues surrounding AI development. As AI technologies become more advanced and integral to various industries, the importance of  sourcing training data responsibly is becoming increasingly evident. 

The outcome of this lawsuit could set a significant precedent for how AI models are trained and the balance between innovation and copyright protection.

Meta’s response to these allegations and the legal decisions that follow will be closely watched by the tech community and content creators alike. 

This case underscores the need for clear legal frameworks and ethical guidelines in the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence.

Crypto products and NFTs are unregulated and can be highly risky. There may be no regulatory recourse for any loss from such transactions. Crypto is not a legal tender and is subject to market risks. Readers are advised to seek expert advice and read offer document(s) along with related important literature on the subject carefully before making any kind of investment whatsoever. Crypto market predictions are speculative and any investment made shall be at the sole cost and risk of the readers.