Bitcoin News

Gold vs Bitcoin Debate Takes New Turn As Fake Bars Fuels Corruption

The gold vs Bitcoin debate took a new turn as reports have revealed that fake bars fuelled a $2.8 billion corruption scheme. Chinese media outlet Caixin reported on June 29 via Nikkei that a loan deal is carried out between Chinese financial institutions and Wuhan Kingold Jewelry. 

It is understood that the gold as collateral fell apart when it became known the gold was gilded copper.

According to Caixin, “at least some” of the gold bars involved were simply copper, with the loan lenders seriously out of pocket as a result.

“That has left lenders holding the bag for the remaining 16 billion yuan of loans outstanding against the bogus bars,” it reported.

The debate in the latest involves fake gold to engulf high-profile entities. 

On allegations that gold reserves in major central banks could also in fact be tainted with other metals. For Bitcoin supporters, gold’s authentication problems form a major argument against investing or holding the precious metal.

According to a survey by analyst Mati Greenspan, it is revealed that Bitcoin was by far the most popular choice for investment. It has been said that forty-two percent of over 2,300 respondents selected it, while gold was in second place.

“This just shows you how delusional #Bitcoin bugs are,” gold bug Peter Schiff  commented on Twitter.

“Given how much further Bitcoin is from its record high relative to the Dow Jones or #gold, they still expect it to make a new high first. Hope is never a good investment strategy.”

Crypto products and NFTs are unregulated and can be highly risky. There may be no regulatory recourse for any loss from such transactions. Crypto is not a legal tender and is subject to market risks. Readers are advised to seek expert advice and read offer document(s) along with related important literature on the subject carefully before making any kind of investment whatsoever. Crypto market predictions are speculative and any investment made shall be at the sole cost and risk of the readers.