Blockchain News

Legal Showdown: Coinbase vs. SEC and its Ripple Effects on the Crypto Landscape

The ongoing legal tussle between Coinbase Global Inc., a prominent publicly listed trading platform, and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has emerged as a focal point of interest within the cryptocurrency industry. Ripple’s Chief Technology Officer (CTO), David Schwartz, has recently shared his perspective on the Amicus submissions that have flooded in from various stakeholders in support of Coinbase.

Amicus submissions, legal briefs submitted by parties not directly involved in a case but with a vested interest in its outcome, have rallied a substantial wave of support for Coinbase Exchange. Industry titans such as Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) and Paradigm, along with six esteemed law professors from institutions like Yale, the University of Chicago, the University of California Los Angeles, Fordham, Boston University, and Widener University, have all voiced their endorsement of Coinbase through these filings. Even Senator Cynthia Lummis has taken her stance on the matter in Congress.

While these Amicus Curiae briefs have undoubtedly undermined the SEC’s securities claims, experts like David Schwartz have scrutinized certain gaps in the presented arguments. In his post on the X platform, Schwartz pointed out that the brief does not adequately address the significance of the Joiner case’s holding. Notably, Joiner serves as a critical Supreme Court case that aptly interpreted the definition of an investment contract.

Amid the legal labyrinth, the consensus among legal experts suggests a fragile foundation for the SEC’s case against Coinbase. This perception is further accentuated by the decision of the lawyer representing XRP holders, who opted against filing an Amicus Brief in the Coinbase vs. SEC case due to the perceived fragility of the SEC’s allegations against the trading platform. In line with this perspective, voices like that of Twitter user David Barrera argue that legal experts have overlooked the true implications of the Joiner case’s holding.

A prevailing standpoint argues that trading digital currencies on secondary platforms should not automatically be categorized as securities. This interpretation garners support from the XRP ruling issued by Judge Analisa Torres. Considering these elements, many onlookers believe that Coinbase stands on advantageous grounds in this ongoing legal clash against the regulatory body, and there’s a growing consensus that the exchange could emerge victorious.

The SEC’s intensified scrutiny on cryptocurrencies, underscored by recent developments such as Bittrex’s $24 million settlement for unlicensed exchange operations, raises questions about its trajectory. Simultaneously, this could cast shadows over the buzz surrounding the potential approval of a Spot Bitcoin ETF. Former SEC attorney John Reed Stark contends that the present SEC is unlikely to green-light a Bitcoin spot ETF application for multifaceted reasons. Stark posits that a crypto-friendlier stance might be witnessed under a Republican-led administration, potentially paving the way for spot ETF approval. Nevertheless, the SEC’s historical disposition toward spot Bitcoin ETFs remains characterized by rejections.

The Coinbase vs. SEC legal skirmish, while pivotal in its own right, is subtly intertwining with the broader regulatory landscape, shaping the future trajectories of both individual entities and the industry as a whole.


Crypto products and NFTs are unregulated and can be highly risky. There may be no regulatory recourse for any loss from such transactions. Crypto is not a legal tender and is subject to market risks. Readers are advised to seek expert advice and read offer document(s) along with related important literature on the subject carefully before making any kind of investment whatsoever. Crypto market predictions are speculative and any investment made shall be at the sole cost and risk of the readers.