United States Senators Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) and Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) may have just introduced a new bill today to prohibit unbacked algorithmic stablecoins.
Tagged the Lummis-Gillibrand Payment Stablecoin Act, the bill seeks first to ensure that stablecoin issuers have their tokens fully backed. That is, their token reserves must either be one-to-one in cash or in cash-equivalent.
It also prohibits algorithmic stablecoins that do not have verifiable backing. Furthermore, the bill also disallows anyone, including issuers and users, from using stablecoins for illicit activities such as money laundering and other related acts.
Lummis-Gillibrand Payment Stablecoin Act to Help Dollar Dominance and Foster Innovation
Primarily, the Lummis-Gillibrand Payment Stablecoin Act establishes a framework that ensures that issuers back their tokens 1:1, prohibits unbacked algorithmic stablecoins, and exerts anti-money laundering rules.
See Also: Traditional Financial Institutions Embrace Tokenization on Public Blockchains
However, there is more to the effect that it serves, according to Sen. Gillibrand. In a statement made available to the public, she said:
“Passing a regulatory framework for stablecoins is absolutely critical to maintaining the US dollar’s dominance, promoting responsible innovation, protecting consumers, and cracking down on money laundering and illicit finance.”
For all intents and purposes, the bill seeks to support innovation. However, not all kinds of innovations can be supported. Therefore, the framework is particularly focused on “responsible” innovations that will fulfill all requirements and comply with its provisions.
According to an official release, the bill has some broader ambitions. It plans to create federal and state regulatory regimes for stablecoin issuers, just like the typical dual banking system.
A typical banking system is found in the United States, where national and state banks have different regulators.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, for instance, oversees the operations of national banks. State regulators, on the other hand, control the state banks.
Meanwhile, despite the arrangement, sometimes there are overlapping regulatory efforts. This means that a bank may be regulated at both the state and federal levels.
Similarly, the Lummis-Gillibrand Payment Stablecoin Act bill would give federal and state regulators authority over stablecoin chartering and enforcement.
Interestingly, the robust new stablecoin act also made provisions to protect customers in the case of issuer insolvency.
See Also: Filecoin Foundation Launches Legal Inquiry Into STFIL Incident In China
Looking Ahead
The need for a robust regulatory framework for stablecoins can not be overemphasized.
Their use cases for quick international transactions, relatively lower fees, and the appeal they now have among programs and apps have contributed to their fast popularity.
However, with the growing relevance, regulators must not lose sight of the fact that bad actors also exist and are also evolving.
Therefore, there is a constant need to keep developing legislation to be able to fully tap the potential of stablecoins and digital assets in general.
Disclaimer: The information provided is not trading advice. Bitcoinworld.co.in holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decisions.
#Binance #WRITE2EARN
Disclaimer: The information provided is not trading advice, Bitcoinworld.co.in holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decisions.